Post by WeAreAllOne on Oct 7, 2017 18:57:20 GMT -8
The Monsanto Papers
Monsanto Co. is facing hundreds of Roundup lawsuits filed by farmers, farm workers, gardeners, landscapers, government workers and a host of other individuals from all across the nation who allege exposure to Roundup weed killer caused them to develop non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and that Monsanto concealed health risks associated with its blockbuster herbicide.
Dozens of these cases were consolidated into a multi-district litigation (MDL) before U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria in the Northern District of California. In March of 2017, Judge Chhabria issued a ruling against Monsanto that allowed documents obtained in discovery by the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee overseeing MDL-2741 (In Re: Roundup Products Liability Litigation) to be unsealed. These court documents are known as the Monsanto Papers.
Below are unsealed court documents, including internal Monsanto memos and emails between employees, along with a host of other information on the litigation.
Monsanto Papers and Court Documents
European Parliament requesting U.S. court documents in Monsanto Roundup litigation (3 pages) (7.13.17) – Four members of EU Parliament wrote a letter to U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria asking for access to court documents from the Roundup cancer litigation. The letter expressed “strong doubts” on the validity of EU glyphosate assessments.
Monsanto’s notice of appeal and representation statement (5 pages) (7.6.17)
Order granting motion to remand (3 pages) (7.5.17) – U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria granted the motion of Plaintiffs to move their Roundup cancer case against Monsanto back to state court in Northern California, despite Monsanto’s efforts to keep the case in federal court. In his ruling, Judge Chhabria rejected Monsanto’s theory for keeping the case federal, and warned of fees if the court is “presented with similarly flimsy theories of removal in the future.”
Videotaped deposition of John Acquavella PhD, day 1 redacted (146 pages) (Discovery document not filed in court) (7.3.17)
Videotaped deposition of Matthew Ross PhD (315 pages) (Discovery document not filed in court) (7.3.17)
Aaron Earl Blair deposition (301 pages) and exhibits 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19A, 19B, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28. (6.16.17) (links to all of these at the bottom)
Remand hearing transcript (19 pages) (6.15.17)
Unredacted versions of plaintiffs’ motion to compel the production of kidney tissue slides and exhibits 1 and 4 (18 pages) (6.8.17) – Roundup cancer attorneys have hired an expert pathologist to analyze the tissue slides from a 1983 Monsanto rodent study on Glyphosate. The analysis could help prove that Monsanto covered up known health risks associated with glyphosate.
Conditional transfer order (CTO-21) (2 pages) (6.1.17)
Miller FOIA lawsuit v. EPA (9 pages) (5.29.17)
Pretrial order no. 24: modified schedule for general causation phase (2 pages) (5.26.17)
Monsanto supplement to May 22, 2017 discovery letter (1 page) (5.26.17)
Plaintiffs’ supplement to May 22, 2017 discovery letter (2 pages) (5.26.17)
Letter on dispute over renal tissue slides from Study BDN-77-420 and schedule (5 pages) (5.22.17)
Plaintiffs’ opposition to continuance of hearing date for plaintiffs’ remand motion (5 pages) (5.19.17)
Monsanto motion to continue unilaterally-noticed hearing date for plaintiffs’ remand motion (5 pages) (5.18.17)
Bio/dynamics kidney slide memo to pathologist regarding glyphosate feeding study in mice (3 pages) (5.16.17)
Memo from Monsanto’s George Levinskas on kidney tumors (2 pages) (5.16.17) – In 1985, George Levinskas, Monsanto’s manager for environmental assessment and toxicology, sent an internal memo implying that a noted academic would review tissue slides from a 1983 glyphosate rodent study and present the evaluation to EPA “in an effort to persuade the agency” that tumors observed in the study weren’t related to glyphosate exposure. The memo was purportedly written before the academic, Dr. Marvin Kuschner, had even seen the slides.
Pretrial orders on motions to compel production and additional testimony (2 pages) (5.15.17)
Plaintiffs’ reply in support of remand (14 pages) (5.12.17)
Declaration of Pedram Esfandiary in support of reply and request for attorney fees and associated costs (4 pages) (5.12.17)
Transcript of court proceedings: May 11, 2017 (64 pages) (5.11.17)
Plaintiffs’ reply in further support of motion to compel responses from Jess Rowland (9 pages) (5.10.17) – Former EPA official Jess Rowland is a central figure in the Monsanto Roundup litigation. Court documents show that Rowland allegedly had a cozy relationship with Monsanto while working at EPA.
Plaintiffs’ reply in further support of motion to compel slides of kidney tissue from mice in study BDN-77-420 (10 pages) (5.10.17)
Email from plaintiffs re: deposition of Jess Rowland (3 pages) (5.9.17)
Jess Rowland’s opposition to motion to compel responses from Jess Rowland (23 pages) (5.9.17) – Former EPA official Jess Rowland, who allegedly had ties to Monsanto while working for the agency, asked the Court to deny Roundup cancer attorneys’ motion to compel further information, and to terminate his discovery obligation.
Jess Rowland’s motion to file under seal (3 pages) (5.9.17)
Monsanto motion to strike and response re: administrative motion to file under seal (4 pages) (5.5.17)
Monsanto’s opposition to motion to compel slides of kidney tissue from mice in study BDN-77-420 (10 pages) (5.5.17)
Declaration of Jess Rowland’s lawyer regarding motion to file under seal (6 pages) (5.2.17)
Monsanto’s answer to plaintiffs’ complaint (26 pages) (5.2.17)
Goodbred v. Monsanto amended complaint (41 pages) (5.2.17)
Order denying Monsanto motion to increase page limit (1 page) (5.2.17)
Pretrial order no. 20: denying motion to de-designate Heydens deposition (2 pages) (5.1.17)
Pretrial order no. 22: Jameson and Ross depositions (1 page) (5.1.17)
Plaintiffs’ arguments over duration of Jameson & Ross depositions (2 pages) (5.1.17)
Monsanto letter on Jameson & Ross depositions (3 pages) (5.1.17)
Monsanto’s motion to increase page limit for opposition to plaintiffs remand motion (3 pages) (5.1.17)
Monsanto’s motion to strike plaintiffs’ reply exhibit 1 and unredacted version of reply (4 pages) (4.28.17)
Plaintiffs’ motion to compel responses from deponent Jess Rowland (11 pages) (4.28.17) – In his deposition, Jess Rowland confirmed to Roundup cancer attorneys that since leaving EPA, he has consulted for three chemical companies with “close ties to Monsanto.”
Judge Chhabria orders Jess Rowland to answer questions about his post-EPA work (1 page) (4.24.17)
Plaintiffs request for hearing to address Jess Rowland’s refusal to answer questions (2 pages) (4.24.17)
Plaintiffs motion to compel the production of all original and re-cut slides of kidney tissue from mice in study BDN-77-420 (8 pages) (4.21.17)
Monsanto’s response to plaintiffs’ request for production of documents (14 pages) (4.21.17)
Plaintiffs reply in support of motion to strike confidentiality of Heydens deposition (5 pages) (4.20.17) – Per court documents, Monsanto started the aptly-named “Let Nothing Go” program to leave nothing, not even Facebook comments, unanswered. According to the motion, “through a series of third parties, it [Monsanto] employs individuals who appear to have no connection to the industry, who in turn post positive comments on news articles and Facebook posts, defending Monsanto, its chemicals, and GMOs.
Judge Chhabria’s order on pretrial redaction of identifying information (1 page) (4.18.17)
Judge Chhabria’s order on additional discovery about IARC (1 page) (4.18.17)
Monsanto letter on privacy of non-party individuals (6 pages) (4.14.17)
Plaintiffs’ amended notice to take videotaped deposition of Jesudoss Rowland (3 page) (4.6.17)
Plaintiffs: administrative motion to file under seal (25 pages) (4.6.17), see especially pp. 6-10 – According to the documents, Monsanto executive William Heydens “appears to have spent a great deal of his career ghostwriting ‘science’ papers to protect Roundup, those efforts rivaled in time and scope only by his colleague David Saltmiras, PhD. This has been an important subject of this litigation so far, and is central to general causation; Monsanto relies heavily upon the scientific literature and governmental approvals of glyphosate for its general causation defense; as the Court is aware, however, the discovery process is yielding substantial evidence that Monsanto is often the puppetmaster behind scientific articles that are positive for the company, as well as U.S. EPA deliberations and reports.”
Monsanto: discovery dispute (10 pages) (4.4.17)
Monsanto Company’s answer to plaintiff’s complaint (31 pages) (3.24.17)
Plaintiffs’ notice to take videotaped deposition of Jesudoss Rowland (4 pages) (3.23.17)
Plaintiffs’ case management statement (28 pages), new documents unsealed (355 pages), key documents on p. 136, pp. 220-1 (3.16.15) – In an internal email from 1999, Monsanto executive William Heydens expressed dissatisfaction with a scientist who had concerns about glyphosate’s safety. Heydens further expressed an unwillingness to perform studies that the scientist suggested needed to be done. Monsanto officials discussed a need to “find/develop someone who is comfortable with the genetox profile of glyphosate/Roundup and who can be influential with regulators… when genetox issues arise.”
Jess Rowland documents unsealed (115 pages), key documents on pp. 99-102. (3.14.17) – Per court documents, former EPA official Jess Rowland allegedly bragged to Monsanto executive William Heydens during a telephone conversation that he deserved a medal if he could kill another government agency’s investigation into glyphosate.
Documents unsealed (227 pages), key documents on pp. 203-4. (3.14.17) – According to the documents, Monsanto allegedly hired academics to ghostwrite scientific papers. Monsanto executive William F. Heydens wrote an email to other company officials:
“We would be keeping the cost down by us doing the writing and they would just edit and sign their names so to speak.” In the same email, Heydens cited a previous instance in which the company had already done this.
Plaintiffs submission in response to pretrial order no. 8 (3.14.17)
Judge Vince Chhabria’s ruling to unseal documents (3.13.17) – U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria, who is overseeing the Roundup cancer MDL in Northern California, threatened to sanction Monsanto if the agrochemical giant persisted in “overbroad” efforts to keep documents relevant to the litigation out of public view. Judge Chhabrias’s ruling allowed for the unsealing of thousands of court documents obtained in discovery.
Plaintiffs’ reply in support of motion to compel deposition of Jess Rowland (2.27.17). Key document: Marion Copley letter on p. 11 (2.27.17) – Marion Copley worked at EPA for decades. She and Jess Rowland worked together. In a letter to Rowland, Copley urged him, “for once in your life, listen to me and don’t play your conniving games with the science to favor” the chemical industry. Copley’s letter goes on to say that Rowland and another EPA official “intimidated staff” into changing reports on glyphosate.
Pretrial order no. 8: order requesting briefing re relevance of EPA and IARC (1.25.17)
Summary of ORD comments on OPP’s glyphosate cancer assessment (12.14.15)
Sources:
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/toxic-tort-law/monsanto-roundup-lawsuit/the-monsanto-papers/
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/toxic-tort-law/monsanto-roundup-lawsuit/
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/toxic-tort-law/monsanto-roundup-lawsuit/roundup-cancer-non-hodgkin-lymphoma/
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/EU-Parliament-requesting-US-court-docs.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/monsanto-notice-appeal-representation-statement.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Order-granting-motion-to-remand.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Videotaped-deposition-of-John-Acquavella-day-1-redacted.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Videotaped-Deposition-of-Matthew-Ross.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-01.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-02.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-03.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-04.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-05.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-06.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-07.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-09.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-10.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-11.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-12.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-13.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-14.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-15.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-16.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-17.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-18.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-19A.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-19B.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-20.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-21.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-22.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-23.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-24.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-25.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-26.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-27.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-28.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Remand-hearing-transcript-June-15-2017.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Unredacted-versions-of-plaintiffs-motion-to-compel-the-production-of-kidney-tissue-slides-and-exhibits-1-and-4.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/monsanto-mouse-study-roundup-cancer/
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Conditional-transfer-order.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Miller-FOIA-lawsuit-vs-EPA.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Pretrial-order-no-24-modified-schedule-for-general-causation-phase.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsanto-supplement-to-May-22-2017-discovery-letter.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-supplement-to-May-22-2017-discovery-letter.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Letter-on-dispute-over-renal-tissue-slides-from-Study-BDN-77-420-and-schedule%20.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-opposition-to-continuance-of-hearing-date-for-plaintiffs-remand-motion.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Memo-from-Monsantos-George-Levinskas-on-kidney-tumors.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Pretrial-orders-on-motions-to-compel-production-and-additional-testimony.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-reply-in-support-of-remand.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Declaration-of-Pedram-Esfandiary-in-support-of-reply-and-request-for-attorney-fees-and-associated-costs.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Transcript-of-court-proceedings-May-11-2017.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-reply-in-support-of-motion-to-compel-deposition-of-Jess-Rowland.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/rowland-glyphosate-influence-efsa/
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-reply-in-further-support-of-motion-to-compel-slides-of-kidney-tissue-from-mice-in-study-BDN-77-420.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsanto-motion-to-strike-and-response-re-plaintiffs-4-28-17-motion-to-file-under-seal.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Email-from-plaintiffs-re-deposition-of-Jess-Rowland.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Jess-Rowlands-opposition-to-motion-to-compel-responses-from-Jess-Rowland.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/epa-inspector-general-investigation-collusion-monsanto/
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Jess-Rowlands-motion-to-file-under-seal.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsanto-motion-to-strike-and-response-re-administrative-motion-to-file-under-seal.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsantos-opposition-to-motion-to-compel-slides-of-kidney-tissue-from-mice-in-study-BDN-77-420.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Declaration-of-Jess-Rowlands-lawyer-regarding-motion-to-file-under-seal.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsantos-answer-to-plaintiffs-complaint.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Goodbred-v.-Monsanto-amended-complaint.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Order-denying-Monsanto-motion-to-increase-page-limit.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Pretrial-order-no-20-denying-motion-to-de-designate-Heydens-deposition.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Pretrial-order-no-22-Jameson-and-Ross-depositions-.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-arguments-over-duration-of-Jameson-&-Ross-depositions.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsanto-letter-on-Jameson-&-Ross-depositions.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsantos-motion-to-increase-page-limit-for-opposition-to-plaintiffs-remand-motion.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsantos-motion-to-strike%20plaintiffs-reply-exhibit-1-and-unredacted-version-of-reply.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-motion-to-compel-responses-from-deponent-Jesudoss-Rowland.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/patient-with-nhl-glyphosate-causes-cancer/
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Judge-Chhabria-orders-Jess-Rowland-to-answer-questions-about-his-post-EPA-work.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-request-for-hearing-to-address-Jess-Rowlands-refusal-to-answer-questions.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-motion-to-compel-the-production-of-all-original-and-re-cut-slides-of-kidney-tissue-from-mice-in-study-BDN-77-420.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsantos-response-to-plaintiffs-request-for-production-of-documents.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-reply-in-support-of-motion-to-strike-confidentiality-of-Heydens-deposition.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/monsanto-paid-internet-trolls/
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Judge-Chhabrias-order-on-pretrial-redaction-of-identifying-information.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Judge-Chhabrias-order-on-additional-discovery-about-IARC.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsanto-letter-on-privacy-of-non-party-individuals.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-amended-notice-to-take-videotaped-deposition-of-Jesudoss-Rowland.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-administrative-motion-to-file-under-seal.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsanto-Discovery-Dispute.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsanto-Company-answer-to-plaintiffs-complaint.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-notice-to-take-videotaped-deposition-of-Jesudoss-Rowland.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-case-management-statement.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Jess-Rowland-documents-unsealed.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Jess-Rowland-documents-unsealed-key-documents-pp-99-102.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/epa-official-helped-monsanto-kill-study/
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/IARC-Statute-Rules-and-Regulations-documents-unsealed.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/key-documents-pages-203-4.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/monsanto-ghostwriting-papers-roundup/
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-submission-in-response-to-pretrial-order-no-8.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Judge-Vince-Chhabrias-ruling-to-unseal-documents.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/judge-roundup-litigation-sanction-monsanto/
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-reply-in-support-of-motion-to-compel-deposition-of-Jess-Rowland.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Marion-Copley-letter.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/roundup-cancer-lawsuit-epa-and-monsanto/
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Pretrial-order-no-8-order-requesting-briefing-re-relevance-of-EPA-and-IARC.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Summary-of-ORD-comments-on-OPPs-glyphosate-cancer-assessment.pdf
Reddit Discussion & Other links:
www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/72pdcl/dig_in_guys_m0nsanto_papers_released_reveals/
GMOs need to be studied more rigously. There is much potential for them, but companies like Monsanto, DuPont, Bayer, etc. are not the right ways to do it, with their business practices and influence in mainstream sciences. Theres also studies showing harm from big bitech GMOs.
There is a problem with fraud and unreporducabe studies in the mainstream sciences.
How Monsanto Buys Science and Promotes Cancer: humansarefree.com/2017/04/how-monsanto-buys-science-and-promotes.html
Monsanto Launches War On Scientists, Says Science Will Ruin Their Business: www.washingtonsblog.com/2017/03/monsanto-launches-war-scientists-says-science-will-ruin-business.html
Monsanto Colluded With EPA, Was Unable To Prove Roundup Does Not Cause Cancer, Unsealed Court Docs Reveal: www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-14/court-docs-prove-monsanto-collusion-epa-kill-cancer-study-admits-cant-say-roundup-do
There is a huge pile of e-mails from the State Dept. about GMO "public education"... apparently the general populous is just fuckin' dumb and we need to smarten up and eat our GMOs... can't keep being sad "Deniers"... It makes DuPont feisty. foia.state.gov/search/results.aspx?searchText=*&caseNumber=F-2015-02377
California is the first U.S. state to require Monsanto to label Roundup as a carcinogen. wearechange.org/california-judge-rules-monsanto-allows-cancer-warning-roundup/
The Corbett Report: Scientists Say Fraud Causing Crisis of Science - #NewWorldNextWeek See video description for sources.
Troubling New Data Shows Most Scientists “Can’t Replicate” Peer Reviewed Studies thefreethoughtproject.com/new-data-exposes-serious-trouble-in-replicating-scientific-studies/
Five companies control more than half of academic publishing : www.nouvelles.umontreal.ca/udem-news/news/20150610-five-companies-control-more-than-half-of-academic-publishing.html
The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era: journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
Academic publishers reap huge profits as libraries go broke: 5 companies publish more than 50 per cent of research papers, study finds:
www.cbc.ca/news/technology/academic-publishers-reap-huge-profits-as-libraries-go-broke-1.3111535
"But is it peer reviewed?" - Fraud and Science: redicecreations.com/article.php?id=22052
University Students Find 1000s of Medical Studies Presented to FDA Riddled with Fraud: www.topsecretwriters.com/2015/02/fda-finds-1000s-medical-studies-riddled-fraud/
Dozens Of Scientific Papers Withdrawn After Peer-Review Fraud Uncovered: www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/dozens-scientific-papers-withdrawn-probably-more-come
Editors In Chief of World’s Most Prestigious Medical Journals: “Much of the Scientific Literature, Perhaps HALF, May Simply Be Untrue” … “It Is Simply No Longer Possible To Believe Much of the Clinical Research That Is Published” www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/06/editors-in-chief-of-worlds-most-prestigious-medical-journals-much-of-the-scientific-literature-perhaps-half-may-simply-be-untrue-it-is-simply-no-longer-poss.html
Editor of Prestigious Medical Journal Says “Science has Taken a Turn into Darkness” therundownlive.com/editor-of-prestigious-medical-journal-says-science-has-taken-a-turn-into-darkness/
Editor In Chief Of World’s Best Known Medical Journal: Half Of All The Literature Is False www.collective-evolution.com/2015/05/16/editor-in-chief-of-worlds-best-known-medical-journal-half-of-all-the-literature-is-false/
Mainstream Science is a Religion www.wakingtimes.com/2016/05/30/mainstream-science-religion/
The difference between the rationalists and the conspiracy theorists
(Please avoid voting, as moderators may consider it as vote brigading if you reach the below link outside of searching through reddit): www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/21of83/the_difference_between_the_rationalists_and_the/
Monsanto Co. is facing hundreds of Roundup lawsuits filed by farmers, farm workers, gardeners, landscapers, government workers and a host of other individuals from all across the nation who allege exposure to Roundup weed killer caused them to develop non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and that Monsanto concealed health risks associated with its blockbuster herbicide.
Dozens of these cases were consolidated into a multi-district litigation (MDL) before U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria in the Northern District of California. In March of 2017, Judge Chhabria issued a ruling against Monsanto that allowed documents obtained in discovery by the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee overseeing MDL-2741 (In Re: Roundup Products Liability Litigation) to be unsealed. These court documents are known as the Monsanto Papers.
Below are unsealed court documents, including internal Monsanto memos and emails between employees, along with a host of other information on the litigation.
Monsanto Papers and Court Documents
European Parliament requesting U.S. court documents in Monsanto Roundup litigation (3 pages) (7.13.17) – Four members of EU Parliament wrote a letter to U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria asking for access to court documents from the Roundup cancer litigation. The letter expressed “strong doubts” on the validity of EU glyphosate assessments.
Monsanto’s notice of appeal and representation statement (5 pages) (7.6.17)
Order granting motion to remand (3 pages) (7.5.17) – U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria granted the motion of Plaintiffs to move their Roundup cancer case against Monsanto back to state court in Northern California, despite Monsanto’s efforts to keep the case in federal court. In his ruling, Judge Chhabria rejected Monsanto’s theory for keeping the case federal, and warned of fees if the court is “presented with similarly flimsy theories of removal in the future.”
Videotaped deposition of John Acquavella PhD, day 1 redacted (146 pages) (Discovery document not filed in court) (7.3.17)
Videotaped deposition of Matthew Ross PhD (315 pages) (Discovery document not filed in court) (7.3.17)
Aaron Earl Blair deposition (301 pages) and exhibits 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19A, 19B, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28. (6.16.17) (links to all of these at the bottom)
Remand hearing transcript (19 pages) (6.15.17)
Unredacted versions of plaintiffs’ motion to compel the production of kidney tissue slides and exhibits 1 and 4 (18 pages) (6.8.17) – Roundup cancer attorneys have hired an expert pathologist to analyze the tissue slides from a 1983 Monsanto rodent study on Glyphosate. The analysis could help prove that Monsanto covered up known health risks associated with glyphosate.
Conditional transfer order (CTO-21) (2 pages) (6.1.17)
Miller FOIA lawsuit v. EPA (9 pages) (5.29.17)
Pretrial order no. 24: modified schedule for general causation phase (2 pages) (5.26.17)
Monsanto supplement to May 22, 2017 discovery letter (1 page) (5.26.17)
Plaintiffs’ supplement to May 22, 2017 discovery letter (2 pages) (5.26.17)
Letter on dispute over renal tissue slides from Study BDN-77-420 and schedule (5 pages) (5.22.17)
Plaintiffs’ opposition to continuance of hearing date for plaintiffs’ remand motion (5 pages) (5.19.17)
Monsanto motion to continue unilaterally-noticed hearing date for plaintiffs’ remand motion (5 pages) (5.18.17)
Bio/dynamics kidney slide memo to pathologist regarding glyphosate feeding study in mice (3 pages) (5.16.17)
Memo from Monsanto’s George Levinskas on kidney tumors (2 pages) (5.16.17) – In 1985, George Levinskas, Monsanto’s manager for environmental assessment and toxicology, sent an internal memo implying that a noted academic would review tissue slides from a 1983 glyphosate rodent study and present the evaluation to EPA “in an effort to persuade the agency” that tumors observed in the study weren’t related to glyphosate exposure. The memo was purportedly written before the academic, Dr. Marvin Kuschner, had even seen the slides.
Pretrial orders on motions to compel production and additional testimony (2 pages) (5.15.17)
Plaintiffs’ reply in support of remand (14 pages) (5.12.17)
Declaration of Pedram Esfandiary in support of reply and request for attorney fees and associated costs (4 pages) (5.12.17)
Transcript of court proceedings: May 11, 2017 (64 pages) (5.11.17)
Plaintiffs’ reply in further support of motion to compel responses from Jess Rowland (9 pages) (5.10.17) – Former EPA official Jess Rowland is a central figure in the Monsanto Roundup litigation. Court documents show that Rowland allegedly had a cozy relationship with Monsanto while working at EPA.
Plaintiffs’ reply in further support of motion to compel slides of kidney tissue from mice in study BDN-77-420 (10 pages) (5.10.17)
Email from plaintiffs re: deposition of Jess Rowland (3 pages) (5.9.17)
Jess Rowland’s opposition to motion to compel responses from Jess Rowland (23 pages) (5.9.17) – Former EPA official Jess Rowland, who allegedly had ties to Monsanto while working for the agency, asked the Court to deny Roundup cancer attorneys’ motion to compel further information, and to terminate his discovery obligation.
Jess Rowland’s motion to file under seal (3 pages) (5.9.17)
Monsanto motion to strike and response re: administrative motion to file under seal (4 pages) (5.5.17)
Monsanto’s opposition to motion to compel slides of kidney tissue from mice in study BDN-77-420 (10 pages) (5.5.17)
Declaration of Jess Rowland’s lawyer regarding motion to file under seal (6 pages) (5.2.17)
Monsanto’s answer to plaintiffs’ complaint (26 pages) (5.2.17)
Goodbred v. Monsanto amended complaint (41 pages) (5.2.17)
Order denying Monsanto motion to increase page limit (1 page) (5.2.17)
Pretrial order no. 20: denying motion to de-designate Heydens deposition (2 pages) (5.1.17)
Pretrial order no. 22: Jameson and Ross depositions (1 page) (5.1.17)
Plaintiffs’ arguments over duration of Jameson & Ross depositions (2 pages) (5.1.17)
Monsanto letter on Jameson & Ross depositions (3 pages) (5.1.17)
Monsanto’s motion to increase page limit for opposition to plaintiffs remand motion (3 pages) (5.1.17)
Monsanto’s motion to strike plaintiffs’ reply exhibit 1 and unredacted version of reply (4 pages) (4.28.17)
Plaintiffs’ motion to compel responses from deponent Jess Rowland (11 pages) (4.28.17) – In his deposition, Jess Rowland confirmed to Roundup cancer attorneys that since leaving EPA, he has consulted for three chemical companies with “close ties to Monsanto.”
Judge Chhabria orders Jess Rowland to answer questions about his post-EPA work (1 page) (4.24.17)
Plaintiffs request for hearing to address Jess Rowland’s refusal to answer questions (2 pages) (4.24.17)
Plaintiffs motion to compel the production of all original and re-cut slides of kidney tissue from mice in study BDN-77-420 (8 pages) (4.21.17)
Monsanto’s response to plaintiffs’ request for production of documents (14 pages) (4.21.17)
Plaintiffs reply in support of motion to strike confidentiality of Heydens deposition (5 pages) (4.20.17) – Per court documents, Monsanto started the aptly-named “Let Nothing Go” program to leave nothing, not even Facebook comments, unanswered. According to the motion, “through a series of third parties, it [Monsanto] employs individuals who appear to have no connection to the industry, who in turn post positive comments on news articles and Facebook posts, defending Monsanto, its chemicals, and GMOs.
Judge Chhabria’s order on pretrial redaction of identifying information (1 page) (4.18.17)
Judge Chhabria’s order on additional discovery about IARC (1 page) (4.18.17)
Monsanto letter on privacy of non-party individuals (6 pages) (4.14.17)
Plaintiffs’ amended notice to take videotaped deposition of Jesudoss Rowland (3 page) (4.6.17)
Plaintiffs: administrative motion to file under seal (25 pages) (4.6.17), see especially pp. 6-10 – According to the documents, Monsanto executive William Heydens “appears to have spent a great deal of his career ghostwriting ‘science’ papers to protect Roundup, those efforts rivaled in time and scope only by his colleague David Saltmiras, PhD. This has been an important subject of this litigation so far, and is central to general causation; Monsanto relies heavily upon the scientific literature and governmental approvals of glyphosate for its general causation defense; as the Court is aware, however, the discovery process is yielding substantial evidence that Monsanto is often the puppetmaster behind scientific articles that are positive for the company, as well as U.S. EPA deliberations and reports.”
Monsanto: discovery dispute (10 pages) (4.4.17)
Monsanto Company’s answer to plaintiff’s complaint (31 pages) (3.24.17)
Plaintiffs’ notice to take videotaped deposition of Jesudoss Rowland (4 pages) (3.23.17)
Plaintiffs’ case management statement (28 pages), new documents unsealed (355 pages), key documents on p. 136, pp. 220-1 (3.16.15) – In an internal email from 1999, Monsanto executive William Heydens expressed dissatisfaction with a scientist who had concerns about glyphosate’s safety. Heydens further expressed an unwillingness to perform studies that the scientist suggested needed to be done. Monsanto officials discussed a need to “find/develop someone who is comfortable with the genetox profile of glyphosate/Roundup and who can be influential with regulators… when genetox issues arise.”
Jess Rowland documents unsealed (115 pages), key documents on pp. 99-102. (3.14.17) – Per court documents, former EPA official Jess Rowland allegedly bragged to Monsanto executive William Heydens during a telephone conversation that he deserved a medal if he could kill another government agency’s investigation into glyphosate.
Documents unsealed (227 pages), key documents on pp. 203-4. (3.14.17) – According to the documents, Monsanto allegedly hired academics to ghostwrite scientific papers. Monsanto executive William F. Heydens wrote an email to other company officials:
“We would be keeping the cost down by us doing the writing and they would just edit and sign their names so to speak.” In the same email, Heydens cited a previous instance in which the company had already done this.
Plaintiffs submission in response to pretrial order no. 8 (3.14.17)
Judge Vince Chhabria’s ruling to unseal documents (3.13.17) – U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria, who is overseeing the Roundup cancer MDL in Northern California, threatened to sanction Monsanto if the agrochemical giant persisted in “overbroad” efforts to keep documents relevant to the litigation out of public view. Judge Chhabrias’s ruling allowed for the unsealing of thousands of court documents obtained in discovery.
Plaintiffs’ reply in support of motion to compel deposition of Jess Rowland (2.27.17). Key document: Marion Copley letter on p. 11 (2.27.17) – Marion Copley worked at EPA for decades. She and Jess Rowland worked together. In a letter to Rowland, Copley urged him, “for once in your life, listen to me and don’t play your conniving games with the science to favor” the chemical industry. Copley’s letter goes on to say that Rowland and another EPA official “intimidated staff” into changing reports on glyphosate.
Pretrial order no. 8: order requesting briefing re relevance of EPA and IARC (1.25.17)
Summary of ORD comments on OPP’s glyphosate cancer assessment (12.14.15)
Sources:
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/toxic-tort-law/monsanto-roundup-lawsuit/the-monsanto-papers/
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/toxic-tort-law/monsanto-roundup-lawsuit/
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/toxic-tort-law/monsanto-roundup-lawsuit/roundup-cancer-non-hodgkin-lymphoma/
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/EU-Parliament-requesting-US-court-docs.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/monsanto-notice-appeal-representation-statement.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Order-granting-motion-to-remand.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Videotaped-deposition-of-John-Acquavella-day-1-redacted.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Videotaped-Deposition-of-Matthew-Ross.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-01.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-02.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-03.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-04.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-05.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-06.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-07.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-09.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-10.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-11.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-12.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-13.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-14.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-15.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-16.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-17.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-18.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-19A.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-19B.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-20.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-21.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-22.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-23.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-24.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-25.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-26.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-27.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Exhibit-Blair-28.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Remand-hearing-transcript-June-15-2017.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Unredacted-versions-of-plaintiffs-motion-to-compel-the-production-of-kidney-tissue-slides-and-exhibits-1-and-4.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/monsanto-mouse-study-roundup-cancer/
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Conditional-transfer-order.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Miller-FOIA-lawsuit-vs-EPA.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Pretrial-order-no-24-modified-schedule-for-general-causation-phase.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsanto-supplement-to-May-22-2017-discovery-letter.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-supplement-to-May-22-2017-discovery-letter.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Letter-on-dispute-over-renal-tissue-slides-from-Study-BDN-77-420-and-schedule%20.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-opposition-to-continuance-of-hearing-date-for-plaintiffs-remand-motion.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Memo-from-Monsantos-George-Levinskas-on-kidney-tumors.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Pretrial-orders-on-motions-to-compel-production-and-additional-testimony.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-reply-in-support-of-remand.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Declaration-of-Pedram-Esfandiary-in-support-of-reply-and-request-for-attorney-fees-and-associated-costs.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Transcript-of-court-proceedings-May-11-2017.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-reply-in-support-of-motion-to-compel-deposition-of-Jess-Rowland.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/rowland-glyphosate-influence-efsa/
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-reply-in-further-support-of-motion-to-compel-slides-of-kidney-tissue-from-mice-in-study-BDN-77-420.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsanto-motion-to-strike-and-response-re-plaintiffs-4-28-17-motion-to-file-under-seal.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Email-from-plaintiffs-re-deposition-of-Jess-Rowland.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Jess-Rowlands-opposition-to-motion-to-compel-responses-from-Jess-Rowland.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/epa-inspector-general-investigation-collusion-monsanto/
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Jess-Rowlands-motion-to-file-under-seal.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsanto-motion-to-strike-and-response-re-administrative-motion-to-file-under-seal.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsantos-opposition-to-motion-to-compel-slides-of-kidney-tissue-from-mice-in-study-BDN-77-420.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Declaration-of-Jess-Rowlands-lawyer-regarding-motion-to-file-under-seal.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsantos-answer-to-plaintiffs-complaint.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Goodbred-v.-Monsanto-amended-complaint.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Order-denying-Monsanto-motion-to-increase-page-limit.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Pretrial-order-no-20-denying-motion-to-de-designate-Heydens-deposition.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Pretrial-order-no-22-Jameson-and-Ross-depositions-.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-arguments-over-duration-of-Jameson-&-Ross-depositions.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsanto-letter-on-Jameson-&-Ross-depositions.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsantos-motion-to-increase-page-limit-for-opposition-to-plaintiffs-remand-motion.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsantos-motion-to-strike%20plaintiffs-reply-exhibit-1-and-unredacted-version-of-reply.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-motion-to-compel-responses-from-deponent-Jesudoss-Rowland.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/patient-with-nhl-glyphosate-causes-cancer/
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Judge-Chhabria-orders-Jess-Rowland-to-answer-questions-about-his-post-EPA-work.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-request-for-hearing-to-address-Jess-Rowlands-refusal-to-answer-questions.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-motion-to-compel-the-production-of-all-original-and-re-cut-slides-of-kidney-tissue-from-mice-in-study-BDN-77-420.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsantos-response-to-plaintiffs-request-for-production-of-documents.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-reply-in-support-of-motion-to-strike-confidentiality-of-Heydens-deposition.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/monsanto-paid-internet-trolls/
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Judge-Chhabrias-order-on-pretrial-redaction-of-identifying-information.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Judge-Chhabrias-order-on-additional-discovery-about-IARC.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsanto-letter-on-privacy-of-non-party-individuals.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-amended-notice-to-take-videotaped-deposition-of-Jesudoss-Rowland.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-administrative-motion-to-file-under-seal.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsanto-Discovery-Dispute.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Monsanto-Company-answer-to-plaintiffs-complaint.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-notice-to-take-videotaped-deposition-of-Jesudoss-Rowland.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-case-management-statement.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Jess-Rowland-documents-unsealed.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Jess-Rowland-documents-unsealed-key-documents-pp-99-102.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/epa-official-helped-monsanto-kill-study/
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/IARC-Statute-Rules-and-Regulations-documents-unsealed.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/key-documents-pages-203-4.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/monsanto-ghostwriting-papers-roundup/
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-submission-in-response-to-pretrial-order-no-8.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Judge-Vince-Chhabrias-ruling-to-unseal-documents.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/judge-roundup-litigation-sanction-monsanto/
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Plaintiffs-reply-in-support-of-motion-to-compel-deposition-of-Jess-Rowland.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Marion-Copley-letter.pdf
www.baumhedlundlaw.com/roundup-cancer-lawsuit-epa-and-monsanto/
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Pretrial-order-no-8-order-requesting-briefing-re-relevance-of-EPA-and-IARC.pdf
baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/Summary-of-ORD-comments-on-OPPs-glyphosate-cancer-assessment.pdf
Reddit Discussion & Other links:
www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/72pdcl/dig_in_guys_m0nsanto_papers_released_reveals/
GMOs need to be studied more rigously. There is much potential for them, but companies like Monsanto, DuPont, Bayer, etc. are not the right ways to do it, with their business practices and influence in mainstream sciences. Theres also studies showing harm from big bitech GMOs.
There is a problem with fraud and unreporducabe studies in the mainstream sciences.
How Monsanto Buys Science and Promotes Cancer: humansarefree.com/2017/04/how-monsanto-buys-science-and-promotes.html
Monsanto Launches War On Scientists, Says Science Will Ruin Their Business: www.washingtonsblog.com/2017/03/monsanto-launches-war-scientists-says-science-will-ruin-business.html
Monsanto Colluded With EPA, Was Unable To Prove Roundup Does Not Cause Cancer, Unsealed Court Docs Reveal: www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-14/court-docs-prove-monsanto-collusion-epa-kill-cancer-study-admits-cant-say-roundup-do
There is a huge pile of e-mails from the State Dept. about GMO "public education"... apparently the general populous is just fuckin' dumb and we need to smarten up and eat our GMOs... can't keep being sad "Deniers"... It makes DuPont feisty. foia.state.gov/search/results.aspx?searchText=*&caseNumber=F-2015-02377
California is the first U.S. state to require Monsanto to label Roundup as a carcinogen. wearechange.org/california-judge-rules-monsanto-allows-cancer-warning-roundup/
The Corbett Report: Scientists Say Fraud Causing Crisis of Science - #NewWorldNextWeek See video description for sources.
Troubling New Data Shows Most Scientists “Can’t Replicate” Peer Reviewed Studies thefreethoughtproject.com/new-data-exposes-serious-trouble-in-replicating-scientific-studies/
Five companies control more than half of academic publishing : www.nouvelles.umontreal.ca/udem-news/news/20150610-five-companies-control-more-than-half-of-academic-publishing.html
The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era: journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
Academic publishers reap huge profits as libraries go broke: 5 companies publish more than 50 per cent of research papers, study finds:
www.cbc.ca/news/technology/academic-publishers-reap-huge-profits-as-libraries-go-broke-1.3111535
"But is it peer reviewed?" - Fraud and Science: redicecreations.com/article.php?id=22052
University Students Find 1000s of Medical Studies Presented to FDA Riddled with Fraud: www.topsecretwriters.com/2015/02/fda-finds-1000s-medical-studies-riddled-fraud/
Dozens Of Scientific Papers Withdrawn After Peer-Review Fraud Uncovered: www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/dozens-scientific-papers-withdrawn-probably-more-come
Editors In Chief of World’s Most Prestigious Medical Journals: “Much of the Scientific Literature, Perhaps HALF, May Simply Be Untrue” … “It Is Simply No Longer Possible To Believe Much of the Clinical Research That Is Published” www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/06/editors-in-chief-of-worlds-most-prestigious-medical-journals-much-of-the-scientific-literature-perhaps-half-may-simply-be-untrue-it-is-simply-no-longer-poss.html
Editor of Prestigious Medical Journal Says “Science has Taken a Turn into Darkness” therundownlive.com/editor-of-prestigious-medical-journal-says-science-has-taken-a-turn-into-darkness/
Editor In Chief Of World’s Best Known Medical Journal: Half Of All The Literature Is False www.collective-evolution.com/2015/05/16/editor-in-chief-of-worlds-best-known-medical-journal-half-of-all-the-literature-is-false/
Mainstream Science is a Religion www.wakingtimes.com/2016/05/30/mainstream-science-religion/
The difference between the rationalists and the conspiracy theorists
(Please avoid voting, as moderators may consider it as vote brigading if you reach the below link outside of searching through reddit): www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/21of83/the_difference_between_the_rationalists_and_the/
