Gavin Newsom Reappears, Claims He Skipped Climate Conference to go ‘Trick-or-Treating’
California Gov. Gavin Newsom has reappeared in public for the first time since October 27th, claiming he missed the Cop26 climate conference to go ‘trick-or-treating’ with his children.
Newsom spoke at the California Economic Summit, where he complained about the “treadmill” of work he had to plough through.
Fox News reports that Newsom’s children held an “intervention” during a family dinner because they “couldn’t believe I was going to miss Halloween.”
“He ultimately decided to stay home because the “knot” in his stomach was too much to bear,” according to the report.
Breitbart’s Joel Pollak wondered why Newsom had to miss the climate summit given that it is still ongoing and Halloween was 10 days ago.
“In addition to family, Newsom claims he has devoted the past two weeks to work — though he spent Saturday at the lavish wedding of billionaire oil heiress Ivy Getty, with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) officiating the nuptial vows,” he writes.
Here is the new Newsom. Doesn't look like the original.
This just in on Friday the 12th. So even though Biden said for companies to go ahead with the vaccine mandate it's been decided that he went "staggeringly overboard". So the emergency stay has turned into a final ruling.
Federal Appeals Court Blocks Biden’s ‘Staggeringly Overbroad’ Vaccine Mandate
The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals has blocked Democrat President Joe Biden’s coronavirus vaccine mandate in a ruling late on Friday, calling it “staggeringly overbroad.”
The three-judge panel in New Orleans ruled that Biden’s mandate “grossly exceeds OSHA’s statutory authority,” writing that “rather than a delicately handled scalpel, the Mandate is a one-size fits-all sledgehammer that makes hardly any attempt to account for differences in workplaces (and workers) that have more than a little bearing on workers’ varying degrees of susceptibility to the supposedly ‘grave danger’ the Mandate purports to address.”
Judges Kurt D. Engelhardt, Edith H. Jones, and Stuart Kyle Duncan, said that the mandate imposed financial burdens on businesses that could potentially violate the Constitution, writing, “The Mandate imposes a financial burden upon them by deputizing their participation in OSHA’s regulatory scheme, exposes them to severe financial risk if they refuse or fail to comply, and threatens to decimate their workforces (and business prospects) by forcing unwilling employees to take their shots, take their tests, or hit the road.”
The court stayed the mandate in a ruling last Saturday, writing that there were potentially “grave statutory and constitutional issues with the Mandate.”
White House Deputy Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre responded the ruling on Monday by saying that the Biden administration’s message to businesses that fall under the mandate is that they “should not wait” to implement the measure.
Immediately following the release of Biden’s vaccine mandate last week, The Daily Wire was the first major company to file a lawsuit against the Biden administration, as the company noted in a report on Thursday:
The lawsuit does not take a position on whether someone should receive the vaccine or not, only against Biden’s mandate, announced earlier this year and unveiled on Thursday morning. The mandate applies to all companies with 100 or more employees and forces those businesses to police the vaccine status of their employees. The Daily Wire, with over 100 employees, falls under the mandate.
The Daily Wire’s lawsuit seeks to overturn Biden’s executive action, arguing that the order is unconstitutional and that the Biden administration violated federal law in drafting it. link
This is Ed Durr who won the Senate seat and ousted long time Sweeney filling that seat. Durr only spent $153 on his campaign, but people in his district were fed up with all the crap that has been transpiring the past 2 years. Ha!
Even before OSHA had announced suspension of Biden’s illegal vaccine mandate earlier today, I recorded the Situation Update podcast late last night (see below), predicting that the Biden vaccine mandate was doomed.
Why? The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals isn’t the only court involved in this. Now, the Sixth Circuit court has taken up the consolidation of 30+ lawsuits against the mandate, spanning the entire country. And the Sixth court has 27 judges, with 20 out of 27 of those judges being nominated by conservative presidents (Bush 1, Bush 2, Trump and even Reagan).
With the Fifth Circuit court issuing its stay of the mandate, and the Sixth Circuit court now taking up the lawsuits filed across the country, it looks like Joe Biden’s unconstitutional vaccine mandate is headed for the trash heap of history. (As is Joe Biden’s entire presidency, come to think of it…) Biden wants to make your body government property… you will be a SLAVE under a vaccine mandate
On the facts alone, the vaccine mandate is blatantly unconstitutional and represents a grave violation of fundamental human rights. It claims that the government owns your body and can force you to be injected with absolutely anything the government labels a “vaccine.” The CDC, notably, had to change their own definition of “vaccines” in order to push mRNA gene therapy propaganda, claiming it’s a vaccine when it isn’t. So who’s to say the government won’t one day claim a euthanasia shot is a vaccine, too? (Or have they already…)
If the American people don’t own their own body, then they are slave property owned by the government… and we have at that point re-established slavery in America. There’s also the issue of discrimination based on what’s in your blood, with the Biden vaccine mandate claiming no one should be allowed to work unless they have toxic spike protein nanoparticles coursing through their veins. He’s essentially demanding that you’re only allowed to work a job if you commit vaccine suicide as an act of obedience to the state.
That’s simply not acceptable. In fact, it is an assault on humanity.
The courts are almost certainly going to strike this down as a broad overreach of power. While vaccine mandates will likely be recognized as legal for biohazard workers who occupy actual laboratories that handle level-IV pathogens, no vaccine can be mandated across the entire working population simply out of a demand that everyone comply with the bizarre demands of the very same government that funded the covid bioweapon to begin with. Vaccine mandates are destroying the US economy, too
Another consideration that the courts must take into account involves the economic implications of forcing people out of work if they don’t comply with experimental medical injections. The worsening supply chain disruptions now afflicting America are largely caused by vaccine mandates, and the emptying of police departments, fire departments and sheriff’s offices — putting public safety at risk — is also due to vaccine mandates.
With hundreds of thousands of Americans already killed by covid vaccines — and possibly millions more this coming winter — it is a rational decision to reject the toxic, experimental jab, especially when the pandemic it claims to halt has a greater than 99% survival rate for most Americans.
Even worse, the experimental vaccine destroys immune function and accelerates cancer tumor growth across the body, meaning that taking the vaccine actually reduces a person’s health and lifespan. Thus, a decision to take the vaccine is an irrational choice that harms society as well as harming the individual.
By striking down the Biden vaccine mandate as unconstitutional, US courts will establish a precedent for fundamental human rights while simultaneously unleashing economic freedom that will help heal America’s broken supply chain and food shortages. If America’s economy is to function, we need people getting back to work, and that includes people with natural immunity who reject deadly vaccine experiments.
Oklahoma legislation would hold employers liable for employee injuries caused by covid “vaccine” mandates
To discourage employers from trying to force Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” on their employees, Oklahoma state Sen. Rob Standridge has introduced new legislation that would hold employees financially liable for injuries and deaths caused by the jabs.
Senate Bill 1106, entitled the “Citizen Health Mandate Protection Act,” encompasses both the private and public sectors. Any employer of any kind would be financially liable for a minimum of $1 million for every injury resulting from Fauci Flu jabs.
The bill would also cover all employers who abide by fake “president” Joe Biden’s federal vaccine mandate, which says that all businesses with more than 100 employees must force their employees to get the lethal injections.
“Many Oklahomans may not know that COVID-19 vaccines have already been given liability protection from the federal government,” Standridge said.
“If an employee is required to receive the vaccine or some other medical treatment as a condition of employment and it causes that person harm, our citizens need to know they’ll have some recourse that will provide them with meaningful relief. That’s what my legislation will do.”
Back in February, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Sec. Alex Azar invoked the 2005 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, which grants total legal immunity to Chinese Virus injection manufacturers like Pfizer and Moderna.
What this Act means is that if someone becomes seriously injured or dies from a Wuhan Flu shot, the company responsible cannot be sued for any financial compensation. This legal immunity is currently scheduled to expire in 2024.
With this in mind, Standridge specifically specified in his bill the following:
“An employer subject to a claim made pursuant to the Citizen Health Mandate Protection Act shall not have the limitations of liability or immunity provided by the Governmental Tort Claims Act or the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act” and “upon a finding of liability after a claim, the employer shall automatically be subject to punitive damages. The minimum award for punitive damages shall be One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00).” The rest of America needs to be like Oklahoma
Earlier in the month, Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt wrote a letter to the U.S. Secretary of Defense rebuking the federal jab mandate that is being forced on National Guardsmen in his state.
“I am writing to request that the Department of Defense immediately consider suspending the COVID-19 vaccine requirement for national guardsmen in Oklahoma,” Stitt wrote in his letter.
“This mandate violates the personal freedoms of many Oklahomans, as it asks them to potentially sacrifice their personal beliefs in order to not lose their jobs. All of our national guardsmen take this calling very seriously. These are patriotic citizens who are willing to put their lives on the line to protect others in our communities during times of greatest need.”
Newly appointed Oklahoma National Guard Adjutant Gen. Thomas Mancino also sent a memo to the federal government on November 11 rejecting the Biden mandate on behalf of his workers, declaring that nobody under his watch will be forced to take the jabs against their will.
“We need more politicians standing up for their citizens,” wrote one commenter at LifeSiteNews.
“Well done to this senator. Hopefully it will change some companies plans for these awful mandates. Late in coming but better than not happening at all. No talk about anything like this, here in Canada. Just take your jabs, hope for the best and shut up!!!”
Another wrote much the same, urging other members of Congress across the country to enact legislation holding employers accountable for any jab damage that occurs to their employees.
Soviet Russia-born lawmaker slams AG Garland: ‘FBI is starting to resemble old KGB’
Soviet Russia-born lawmaker Rep. Victoria Spartz (R-IN) grilled Attorney General Merrick Garland during a congressional hearing over the Justice Department’s anti-parent agenda under the Biden administration.
(Article by Jay Greenberg republished from NeonNettle.com)
During Garland’s testimony before a House committee on Thursday, Spartz told the AG that the “FBI is starting to resemble old KGB” under his leadership.
“Mr. Attorney General, as someone who was born in the Soviet Union, I am disturbed, very disturbed, by the use of the Department of Justice as a political tool, and its power as the police state to suppress lawful public discourse,” she said.
“The FBI is starting to resemble old KGB with secret warrantless surveillance, wiretapping, and intimidation of citizens.
“School board [inaudible] is the latest example.”
“It’s interesting that during the Soviet era, the United States criticized the use of the domestic terrorism concept in the USSR as a tool to suppress free speech and political dissent,” she continued.
“In your recent statement opposing the Texas anti-abortion law, you said it is the foremost responsibility of the Department of Justice to defend the Constitution.
“Do you plan to defend the Second Amendment rights which are explicitly protected by our Constitution as vigorously as you do abortion rights? Yes or no?”
As someone who grew up in the USSR, I’m disturbed that FBI is starting to resemble KGB – intimidation, surveillance, suppression of dissent… AG Garland @thejusticedept also didn’t firmly reassure us that they will keep Americans safe in light of the border & Afghanistan crises. pic.twitter.com/92YjAjXhb0
— Rep. Victoria Spartz (@repspartz) October 21, 2021
While Garland had been called to testify on the Capitol riot probe, Republicans grilled the attorney general on a number of other issues that had arisen on his watch.
Spartz later pressed Garland over alleged abuses of FISA warrants by federal law enforcement officials, Biden’s border crisis, and Biden’s disastrous pullout from Afghanistan.
Republicans had serious concerns about a memo issued earlier this month by the attorney general directing the FBI and federal prosecutors to meet with local law enforcement to crack down on parents raising issues to school officials.
GOP lawmakers suggested that Garland’s memo cast parents who objected to curriculum decisions and policies related to their kids’ health as “domestic terrorists.”
Garland rejected the assertions, saying the memo imposed no restrictions on parents who were free to raise questions and disagree on decisions involving their children.
“I do not believe parents should be classified as domestic terrorists,” the attorney general said.
He claimed that the FBI and federal prosecutors were concerned only with violence and threats of violence directed at school personnel.
Biden files emergency motion to restore vaccine mandate
The Biden administration filed an emergency order Tuesday to reinstate its vaccine mandate on private companies after an appeals court blocked it, suspending enforcement.
Earlier this month, the Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans order a pause on the order issued under President Biden's direction by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
The motion Tuesday by the Justice Department was filed with the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati, the Wall Street Journal reported.
The Sixth Circuit was designated last week by a federal judicial panel to decide legal challenges related to the private vaccine mandate. The court has the authority to grant the administration's request to dissolve the Fifth Circuit's stay.
The DOJ argued the OSHA rules reflect the agency's "judgment that these measures are necessary to mitigate COVID-19 transmission in the workplace, and the grievous harms the virus inflicts on workers."
Lawsuits against the order -- which requires companies with 100 or more workers to ensure all employees are vaccinated or tested regularly -- have been filed by a number of Republican-led states, employers, unions and private organizations.
In general, the lawsuits contend OSHA is engaged in unconstitutional government overreach in the private sector. Workers, according to the rule, must get vaccinated by Jan. 4 or be tested weekly at their own cost and wear a mask at work.
Employers face fines of up to $13,653 per violation or $136,532 for repeat offenders or those determined to be intentionally flouting the rule.
An estimated 84 million workers at businesses with 100 or more employees are affected.
At the Fifth Circuit, Judge Kurt Engelhardt wrote that he had "grave" concerns that the rule is constitutional.
"The mandate is staggeringly overbroad, he wrote in the majority opinion. "The mandate is a one-size-fits-all sledgehammer that makes hardly any attempt to account for differences in workplaces (and workers)."
The Justice Department has vowed to "vigorously defend" the mandate.link
Fair Use Notice: This website may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law.