NSW Health re-classifies death statistics to ‘died with’ COVID | VideoNSW Health has switched to recording patients as dying ‘with COVID’, instead of ‘from’, as it acknowledges that not all reported deaths are directly linked.
Dr. Jeremy McAnulty said the change in language was because it was ‘very difficult to know’ whether someone with COVID died from the virus, or another health complication.
We have also included a compilation of many other locations across the world who have done the same.
It was reported that six people died due to COVID-19 in 24 hours on the weekend, bringing the total death toll of this outbreak to 89 death since June 16.
But just how many of these deaths were actually because of COVID?
NSW Health has switched to recording patients as dying ‘with’, instead of ‘from’ COVID, as it acknowledges not all of the states reported deaths were directly linked to the ‘deadly virus’.
Dr Jeremy McAnulty made the bombshell admission during Sunday’s COVID briefing.
He said the change in language was because it was ‘very difficult to know’ whether someone with COVID died from the virus, or another health complication:
In the following video, Dr. McAnulty explains how some of the deaths previously reported as ‘from COVID’, were actually the consequence of another health condition or the victim had fully recovered from the virus before their death:
“We know when elderly people die, they can have a range of comorbidities, and also, being old increases your risk of death,” he said.
“COVID may often play a role in the death, but it may not. Sometimes, some of our cases who have sadly died appear to have recovered from COVID, and then they have died of something else.
We report people who have died “with” COVID, unless there is a very clear alternative.“
He added that it was difficult for doctors who were looking after patients to know exactly how much the virus contributed to their death.
New South Wales Health is beginning to official acknowledge that much of the state — indeed, the national — ‘COVID deaths count’ is not all based on direct deaths from the ‘virus’.
The move comes after the spread of some very shaky COVID death news in recent weeks.
Earlier this month, Ady Al-Askar — a forklift truck driver from Liverpool — collapsed in his shower after reportedly contracting COVID-19 from his wife Yasmin, who works in aged care.
The 27-year-old was isolating with his wife in their unit in Sydney’s southwest and barely showed any COVID symptoms before his untimely death.
However, heart conditions reportedly run in the Al-Askar family, and his cousin, Khalid Thijeel, told reporters that he believed it was this that cost the man his life, not the virus.
Paramedics who responded to the emergency reportedly confirmed that Ms Al-Askar suffered heart failure, whereas the hospital and Dr Chant specified that COVID was a contributing factor:
Yet, this didn’t stop the mainstream media from running with the story without adding full context:
NSW Chief Health Officer, Kerry Chant, said Mr Al-Askar was being cared for by the local health district, but ‘suddenly deteriorated’.
“He was being checked daily and he did complain of feeling a little fatigued but the deterioration happened suddenly, is my understanding. We are aware that with COVID you can get sudden deaths,” she said at the time.
However, the people weren’t buying it.
NSW authorities have since been forced to change their classifications in an official capacity, which will allow free thinkers a better opportunity to discuss this point with those they seek to educate.
Don’t solely believe media spin when you read a story — examine it for yourself.
Not just in New South Wales, but all across the world.
In fact, the state is a little late to the party with this classification. Many other jurisdictions have already detailed the complications with accurately determining COVID death counts.
NSW JOINS OTHER LOCATIONS
Including Victoria..
New South Wales has admitted something that ‘conspiracy theorists’ have known for a while now, and that it the fact that COVID death classifications are suspicious as best, like most statistics.
The following compilation highlights other locations that have also proclaimed the same thing:
How can oppressive lockdown measures even be considered with this kind of broad analysis?
Millions of lives destroyed to protect citizens from a virus that can barely even be classified.
Stories of people dying with existing co-morbidities being included to drive a baseless narrative.
Are they now switching to do the same with children?
No documents provided, no clear determination of deaths, no end in sight.
New South Wales will soon pass Victoria for the longest consecutive time in lockdown very soon, as local residents continue to be treated like domestic terrorists.
All ‘justified’ by this type of deceptive ‘science’.
If this type of trickery doesn’t show you that the past 18 months have not been about a virus, then I’m afraid that nothing will. They admit it right in front of our eyes now.
Source
