|
Post by linen on Jul 28, 2021 15:03:14 GMT -8
Lol, we will never know because we won't get the injection.
|
|
|
Post by linen on Jul 29, 2021 6:21:23 GMT -8
According to Karen Kingston, a former Pfizer employee and current analyst for the pharmaceutical and medical device industries, there is graphene oxide in the bioweapon shots. Rumble video 25 min long I just report what I find, folks. You have to do your own research and decide for yourself. I was relieved to hear her say that there is no way Mr T or Sean Hannity could have known that these injections contain graphene oxide. You'll have to listen to the video to understand why. That gave me a boost of confidence in both of them.
|
|
|
Post by Yoda on Jul 29, 2021 10:47:41 GMT -8
According to Karen Kingston, a former Pfizer employee and current analyst for the pharmaceutical and medical device industries, there is graphene oxide in the bioweapon shots. Rumble video 25 min long I just report what I find, folks. You have to do your own research and decide for yourself. I was relieved to hear her say that there is no way Mr T or Sean Hannity could have known that these injections contain graphene oxide. You'll have to listen to the video to understand why. That gave me a boost of confidence in both of them. My sidey senses were right....
|
|
|
Post by Yoda on Jul 29, 2021 12:12:47 GMT -8
County Officials Find 25% of COVID Deaths ‘CLEARLY Not Caused by COVID-19’
In California’s seventh largest county, Alameda, health officials have made a rather bombshell admission — 25% of all deaths attributed to COVID-19 in the county of 1.6 million people, were actually not caused by the virus at all.
The Alameda County Public Health Department made the announcement on Friday and revised the death toll from 1,634 to 1,223 — a 25% decrease or 411 total cases.
“There are definitely people who died from reasons that were clearly not caused by COVID,” said Neetu Balram, a spokesperson for the Alameda County Public Health Department.
According to a report from Oaklandside.org, Balram couldn’t give specifics about the true cause of death for the 411 people removed from the COVID-19 data, but she said the cases were identified after reviewing codes entered by county coroners into CalREDIE, the state’s database for disease reporting and surveillance. Alameda County uses CalREDIE data to populate its COVID dashboard.
“We knew any change like this would have raised some eyebrows,” Nicholas Moss, Alameda County’s health officer told The Oaklandside. “Nothing about this changes our policy decisions now or during the height of the pandemic.” From The Oaklandside:
Balram said the state’s definition was different: A death can only be attributed to COVID-19 if the coroner or medical provider can show that the person died “as a direct result of COVID-19, with COVID-19 as a contributing cause of death, or in whom death caused by COVID-19 could not be ruled out.”
The state came up with this definition late last year in the middle of the pandemic, after Alameda County was already using its method.
“Obviously our definition was broader than the state’s,” Balram said, adding the 411 deaths being removed were “clearly not COVID.”
This reversal from Alameda county backs up many claims from other health officials who stated their cities were attributing deaths to COVID-19 when they clearly were not.
As TFTP reported in March, similar findings came out of Illinois. Monroe County Coroner Bob Hill made waves in his home state of Illinois after he examined a portion of the list of possible COVID-19 deaths. What he found was utterly shocking and has led to calls for an audit of COVID-19 deaths in his state.
According to the Center Square, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention listed 19,893 deaths through the end of February in Illinois where COVID-19 was listed among multiple causes. Of those deaths, about 1,830, or 9.2%, had COVID-19 listed as the sole cause of death.
That percentage is higher than it was in September 2020 when the rate was about 6%.
However, Hill calls these numbers into question after reviewing many of the cases, finding that people who died from clearly non-COVID-19 issues are being counted as dying from COVID-19.
“My concern is, I’ve reviewed several cases, (of 100 cases) about ten of them here in Monroe County, that the state has deemed COVID-related deaths and none of them have had underlying conditions or contributing factors to COVID,” Hill said. “So my concern is no matter when the person was tested positive, the state is automatically giving them a death classification as related to COVID.”
One glaring case the coroner found during his review was a man who died from an accidental drug overdose.
The man died in January from the overdose but tested positive three months prior in October for COVID-19. His death was recorded as a COVID-19 death, according to Hill.
Grand County, Colorado Coroner: 40% Of The COVID-19 Deaths Were Actually Victims Of Gunshot Wounds.
“As soon as that death came across to the state they went ahead and classified and put a statistic as a COVID death,” Hill said.
After Hill made his concerns public, the Illinois Department of Public Health and the governor responded with the health department admitting the data may change.
“Once IDPH has a chance to further investigate the data, connect with local health departments about specific cases, review death records, and conduct other quality assurance measures, the data may change,” a department spokesperson said.
“A confirmed or probable COVID-19 case will be considered if: Death is within 30 days of symptom onset,” among other factors, the department said.
But Hill found cases that don’t even come close to fitting this criteria.
“We’re seeing people on the list that they’ve put as a COVID death that have tested positive 9 months ago that have since recovered that have died from other issues unrelated to COVID,” Hill said.
As stated above, there are cases like this from coast to coast. One insanely glaring case comes from New York in which a man was shot 7 times by police.
Ricardo Cardona, 55, was shot 7 times by New York police officers and died five days later in the hospital. His cause of death was not listed as gun shots, however. According to reports, he died of COVID-19 despite the seven bullet holes in his body. You cannot make this up.
|
|
|
Post by Yoda on Jul 29, 2021 21:30:04 GMT -8
This video is about a person who was fine after the 1st dose of the vaccine. After receiving the second dose, the guy contracts pneumonia. Three days later, he's dead.
|
|
|
Post by Yoda on Jul 29, 2021 21:33:28 GMT -8
Pfizer Analyst Decrees "STOP the Vaccines" Confirmed Dangerous and Deadly - Stew Peters
The madness continues.
Stew Peters exclusively talks with Karen Kingston, a former Pfizer employee and current analyst for the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. She comes forward with indisputable documentation that should be shared with the ENTIRE WORLD!
The inoculation being referred to as ‘COVID Vaccines’ is a poisonous death sentence, and nobody should subject themselves to the shots.
ExercisingFreedom Pfizer Analyst Decrees STOP the Vaccines Confirmed Dangerous and Deadly Shots!
Source
|
|
|
Post by linen on Jul 30, 2021 3:35:09 GMT -8
I like Stew Peters. He has had some very interesting guests.
|
|
|
Post by linen on Jul 30, 2021 3:36:03 GMT -8
This video is about a person who was fine after the 1st dose of the vaccine. After receiving the second dose, the guy contracts pneumonia. Three days later, he's dead.
You would think people would start to wake the fuck up. Do the research!
|
|
|
Post by linen on Jul 30, 2021 3:38:05 GMT -8
Pfizer Analyst Decrees "STOP the Vaccines" Confirmed Dangerous and Deadly - Stew Peters
The madness continues.
Stew Peters exclusively talks with Karen Kingston, a former Pfizer employee and current analyst for the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. She comes forward with indisputable documentation that should be shared with the ENTIRE WORLD!
The inoculation being referred to as ‘COVID Vaccines’ is a poisonous death sentence, and nobody should subject themselves to the shots.
ExercisingFreedom Pfizer Analyst Decrees STOP the Vaccines Confirmed Dangerous and Deadly Shots!
Source
Did you hear the part about how graphene oxide is an electrical conductor? It isn't charged yet but it can and she said it can connect to the internet?
|
|
|
Post by Yoda on Jul 30, 2021 17:54:23 GMT -8
CDC Revokes Emergency Use Authorisation to RT-PCR for COVID-19 Testing
The CDC has announced that they will revoke the emergency use authorization given to RT-PCR for COVID-19 testing.
On 21st July, 2021 the CDC gave out a Laboratory Alert revoking the EUA for RT-PCR tests to detect SARS-COV-2.
“After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.”
The CDC also recommended clinical laboratories and testing sites using RT-PCR to transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test.
“In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.”
Numerous courts around the world have determined the use of RT-PCR for detection of SARS-COV-2 as unreliable and downright fraudulent.
A Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.
The court stated, the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concludes that:
“if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”
Similarly, the Austrian court has ruled that PCR tests are not suitable for COVID-19 diagnosis and that lockdowns has no legal or scientific basis.
The court pointed out that “a PCR test is not suitable for diagnosis and therefore does not in itself say anything about the disease or infection of a person”.
“However, the Minister of Health uses a completely different, much broader case definition for Covid-19 diagnosis, which cannot be used to justify the prohibition of a meeting.”
Then an Austrian parliamentary member exposed the defectiveness of the government’s COVID-19 tests by demonstrating in the parliament how a glass of Coca-Cola tested positive for COVID-19.
Even the World Health Organization (WHO) itself took a u-turn and changed its PCR test ctiteria cautioning experts not to rely solely on the results of a PCR test to detect the coronavirus.
As GreatGameIndia reported earlier, the standard coronavirus tests threw up a huge number of positive cases daily. These tests are done based on faulty WHO protocols which were designed to include false positives cases as well.
This fact about false positives of PCR Tests was first noted in public by Dr. Beda M. Stadler, a Swiss biologist, emeritus professor, and former director of the Institute of Immunology at the University of Bern.
So if we do a PCR corona test on an immune person, it is not a virus that is detected, but a small shattered part of the viral genome. The test comes back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left.
Correct: Even if the infectious viruses are long dead, a corona test can come back positive, because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected].
Earlier, the WHO’s testing protocol was even questioned by Finland’s national health authority. WHO had called on countries to test as many patients as possible for coronavirus.
Finland ran out of testing capacity and began limiting coronavirus tests to the most vulnerable groups and healthcare personnel only. Finland’s national health authority said that testing people with mild symptoms would be a waste of healthcare resources.
In a startling disclosure, Finland’s head of health security, Mika Salminen dismissed WHO advisory saying the WHO doesn’t understand pandemics and that their Coronavirus testing protocol is illogical and doesn’t work.
Source and more here
|
|